Don't worry, I knew all along, saying something like that as an insult is not your style. They do title shit like that just for hits though rather than because they have a unique point. It's the same social justice everywhere else is giving, right down to having to wade through a sea of smugness to get to the point.
Thanks.....I think.
How they did financially is beside the point.
Only difference is I talk out of my head instead of my ass.
This just doesn't need to apply with that specific formula. If all they have are some good characters, but not a good plot, then just have those characters do fun things in the cutscenes and leave it at that. Games can get away with that in a way movies cannot.
Replace silly with awesome.
I actually didn't think much of Lebowski first time I saw it either. But it's one of those movies that gets better with every rewatch.
Yeah, the Wii one. Never played the DS one, but assume it's good since it looked a lot like Rush.
Actually Sonic was on the Neo Geo Pocket Color before he was on the Gamecube. Was a pretty cool game too, I'd say better than any other post-Genesis Sonic's except maybe Rush. I'd like to see Boom do well too.
What I expect though is a decent game with potential that could be something great, just like with Colors, Generations, and Lost World. But I'm still more optimistic than I've been in years for him because of the cartoon. If that's a success, then I know they'll stick with Boom and maybe create a sequel that really nails it. Not like 1 is really that good looking back anyways, it was just different. Sega's been giving plenty of Sonic 1's, but no Sonic 2's.
Well, you got half of it right. Colors wasn't that good. Controls needed more polish and Sega still hasn't made a 3D Sonic with level design that really worked for its gameplay. A good first step they should have, but didn't capitalized on.
